Abstract
Background and purpose: Degenerative change of the corpus callosum might serve as a clinically useful surrogate marker for net pathological cerebral impact of diabetes type 1. We compared manual and automatic measurements of the corpus callosum, as well as differences in callosal cross-sectional area between subjects with type 1 diabetes and healthy controls.Materials and methods: This is a cross-sectional study on 188 neurologically asymptomatic participants with type 1 diabetes and 30 healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects, recruited as part of the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study. All participants underwent clinical work-up and brain MRI. Callosal area was manually measured and callosal volume quantified with FreeSurfer. The measures were normalized using manually measured mid-sagittal intracranial area and volumetric intracranial volume, respectively.Results: Manual and automatic measurements correlated well (callosal area vs. volume: ρ = 0.83, p < 0.001 and mid-sagittal area vs. intracranial volume: ρ = 0.82, p < 0.001). We found no significant differences in the callosal measures between cases and controls. In type 1 diabetes, the lowest quartile of normalized callosal area was associated with higher insulin doses (p = 0.029) and reduced insulin sensitivity (p = 0.033). In addition, participants with more than two cerebral microbleeds had smaller callosal area (p = 0.002).Conclusion: Manually measured callosal area and automatically segmented are interchangeable. The association seen between callosal size with cerebral microbleeds and insulin resistance is indicative of small vessel disease pathology in diabetes type 1.
Highlights
Corpus Callosum (CC) is the largest commissure of the brain, responsible for much of inter-hemispheric communication [1]
Decrease in cross-sectional sagittal area of the CC (CCA) has been used as a surrogate for cerebral atrophy, based on the observation that CCA is proportional to the number of axons passing through the CC [1, 2], and that callosal axon density does not decrease with callosal size [1]
CCA and mid-sagittal cross-sectional area (MISS) measurements had an intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.989 and 0.996, respectively
Summary
Corpus Callosum (CC) is the largest commissure of the brain, responsible for much of inter-hemispheric communication [1]. Decrease in cross-sectional sagittal area of the CC (CCA) has been used as a surrogate for cerebral atrophy, based on the observation that CCA is proportional to the number of axons passing through the CC [1, 2], and that callosal axon density does not decrease with callosal size [1]. To get a measure of callosal shrinkage, and to correct for individual differences in brain size, CCA can be normalized to mid-sagittal cross-sectional area (MISS). MISS functions as a surrogate for maximally attained brain size [4], and this normalized measure does not differ between the sexes [4]. We compared manual and automatic measurements of the corpus callosum, as well as differences in callosal cross-sectional area between subjects with type 1 diabetes and healthy controls
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have