Abstract
Proton magnetic resonance(MR) imaging without utilization of surface coils was compared with high resolution computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of 15 patients with orbital or ocular mass lesions. We present five representative cases of lesions that were imaged. CT images of orbital lesions were superior to MR mainly because of direct visualization of orbital bone by CT. The advantages of MR included lack of ionizing radiation and potential of differentiating tissue characteristics of the lesions. Intraocular lesions were imaged with equal clarity by both modalities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
