Abstract

Abstract. We investigate the ability of the cylindrically symmetric force-free magnetic cloud (MC) fitting model of Lepping et al. (1990) to faithfully reproduce actual magnetic field observations by examining two quantities: (1) a difference angle, called β, i.e., the angle between the direction of the observed magnetic field (Bobs) and the derived force free model field (Bmod) and (2) the difference in magnitudes between the observed and modeled fields, i.e., ΔB(=|Bobs|−|Bmod|), and a normalized ΔB (i.e., ΔB/<B>) is also examined, all for a judiciously chosen set of 50 WIND interplanetary MCs, based on quality considerations. These three quantities are developed as a percent of MC duration and averaged over this set of MCs to obtain average profiles. It is found that, although and its normalize version are significantly enhanced (from a broad central average value) early in an average MC (and to a lesser extent also late in the MC), the angle is small (less than 8°) and approximately constant all throughout the MC. The field intensity enhancements are due mainly to interaction of the MC with the surrounding solar wind plasma causing field compression at front and rear. For example, for a typical MC, ΔB/ is: 0.21±0.27 very early in the MC, −0.11±0.10 at the center (and −0.085±0.12 averaged over the full "central region," i.e., for 30% to 80% of duration), and 0.05±0.29 very late in the MC, showing a double sign change as we travel from front to center to back, in the MC. When individual MCs are examined we find that over 80% of them possess field enhancements within several to many hours of the front boundary, but only about 30% show such enhancements at their rear portions. The enhancement of the MC's front field is also due to MC expansion, but this is usually a lesser effect compared to compression. It is expected that this compression is manifested as significant distortion to the MC's cross-section from the ideal circle, first suggested by Crooker et al. (1990), into a more elliptical/oval shape, as some global MC studies seem to confirm (e.g., Riley and Crooker, 2004) and apparently also as confirmed for local studies of MCs (e.g., Hidalgo et al., 2002; Nieves-Chinchilla et al., 2005).

Highlights

  • We are concerned here with evaluating the capability of the force-free cylindrically symmetric magnetic cloud (MC) fitting model of Lepping et al (1990) to reproduce average input data, for relatively good quality MCs, as defined below

  • Burlaga and coworkers as a interplanetary structure having enhanced field magnitude, a relatively smooth change in field direction as the spacecraft passes through the MC, and lower proton temperature than the surrounding solar wind

  • We analyze here the Lepping et al (1990) model’s average ability to provide separately field directions and field magnitudes that are consistent with observations using a large number of WIND MCs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We are concerned here with evaluating the capability of the force-free cylindrically symmetric (and so-called constant alpha) magnetic cloud (MC) fitting model of Lepping et al (1990) to reproduce average input data (average magnetic field vector observations), for relatively good quality MCs, as defined below. This model is based on MC properties earlier discussed by Burlaga et al (1981), Goldstein (1983), and Burlaga (1988). The study here is concerned with finding quantitatively how field observations typically deviate from the MC model field, as a function of percent travel through the average MC, i.e., as a function of space, and with any implications

Analysis and results: field direction
Analysis and results: field magnitude
Findings
Summary and discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.