Abstract
This research aims at comparing the performance of different machine learning algorithms used for NaI(TI) gamma-ray detector based radioisotope identification. Six machine learning algorithms were implemented, including support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), logistic regression (LR), naive Bayes (NB), decision tree (DT), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). The hyper-parameters of each model were elaborately optimized. The effects of data size, statistical fluctuation, and spectrum drift were considered. Results show that for smaller data size (5 types of radioisotopes and 6000 spectra), the support vector machine and the logistic regression classifier exhibit higher identification accuracy with less training/predicting time. Whereas for larger data size (14 types of radioisotopes corresponding to the standard IEC 62327–2017), the multilayer perceptron showed highest accuracy but required the longest time for model training. The naive Bayes classifier and the decision tree were prone to make mistakes when fluctuations and distortions were added to the spectra. The k-nearest neighbor classifier, though showing high accuracy for most data sets, consumed the longest time while making prediction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.