Abstract

<h3>Purpose</h3> Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are often used to support end-stage heart failure and as a bridge-to-transplant therapy (BTT) to heart transplantation (HTx). We compared survival outcomes of continuous-flow LVAD (CF-LVAD) used BTT versus HTx patients. <h3>Methods</h3> Adult HTx and BTT patients were extracted from UNOS database (2005-2020) for analysis. CF-LVADs were implanted at and during the time of listing. Descriptive analysis (Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U testing) were performed using variables such as age, gender, ethnicity, blood groups, ventilator and ECMO usage, ventilator time, and length of stay (LOS). A Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curve compared the survival outcomes, which were analyzed by the log-rank test. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation using SPSS 25.0 inc. A p<0.05 value was considered significant. <h3>Results</h3> Out of 76,482 total HTx patients, adult BTT and HTx patients (n=33,297) were analyzed. 9,420 received CF-LVAD whereas n=23,877 underwent direct HTx. Data for both groups showed 74% male, 66% white, 21% black, 8% Hispanic, 3% Asian, and 2% other; mean age 53 ± 12 years; mean LOS 21 ± 25 days; blood groups O-39%, A-40%, B-15%, AB-6%; ECMO usage 1.2%; and ventilator usage 1.7%. 35% received ventilator at the time of transplant (Tx), 26% received ventilator within 3 months of Tx, and 39% received ventilator more than 3 months prior to Tx. When compared between groups, there were significant differences in age (p<0.001), gender (p<0.001), ethnicity (p<0.001), blood groups (p<0.001), ventilator time (p<0.001), ECMO usage (p<0.001), and LOS (p<0.001) and no statistical significance in ventilator usage (p=0.08). K-M graph showed 90% overall survival at 1-year (p=0.150), 86% survival at 3-years (p=0.221), 82% survival at 5-years (p=0.084), and 76% survival at 10-years (p=0.380). <h3>Conclusion</h3> The 10-year analysis period showed no statistical significance in survival differences between HTx patients with and without LVAD. All other variables except ventilator usage had significant differences in the two groups.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.