Comparison of low oxidoreduction potential cytochromec553 fromDesulfovibrio vulgaris with the class I cytochromec family

Abstract

The cytochrome c553 from Desulfovibrio vulgaris (DvH c553) is of importance in the understanding of the relationship of structure and function of cytochrome c due to its lack of sequence homology with other cytochromes, and its abnormally low oxido-reduction potential. In evolutionary terms, this protein also represents an important reference point for the understanding of both bacterial and mitochondrial cytochromes c. Using the recently determined nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of the reduced protein we compare the structural, dynamic, and functional characteristics of DvH c553 with members of both the mitochondrial and bacterial cytochromes c to characterize the protein in the context of the cytochrome c family, and to understand better the control of oxide-reduction potential in electron transfer proteins. Despite the low sequence homology, striking structural similarities between this protein and representatives of both eukaryotic [cytochrome c from tuna (tuna c)] and prokaryotic [Pseudomonas aeruginosa c551 (Psa c551)] cytochromes c have been recognized. The previously observed helical core is also found in the DvH c553. The structural framework and hydrogen bonding network of the DvH c553 is most similar to that of the tuna c, with the exception of an insertion loop of 24 residues closing the heme pocket and protecting the propionates, which is absent in the DvH c553. In contrast, the Psa c551 protects the propionates from the solvent principally by extending the methionine ligand arm. The electrostatic distribution at the recognized encounter surface around the heme in the mitochondrial cytochrome is reproduced in the DvH c553, and corresponding hydrogen bonding networks, particularly in the vicinity of the heme cleft, exist in both molecules. Thus, although the cytochrome DvH c553 exhibits higher primary sequence homology to other bacterial cytochromes c, the structural and physical homology is significantly greater with respect to the mitochondrial cytochrome c. The major structural and functional difference is the absence of solvent protection for the heme, differentiating this cytochrome from both reference cytochromes, which have evolved different mechanisms to cover the propionates. This suggests that the abnormal redox potential of the DvH c553 is linked to the raised accessibility of the heme and supports the theory that redox potential in cytochromes is controlled by heme propionate solvent accessibility.