Abstract
This study photoelastically compared the stress distribution characteristics of two maxillary bilateral distal-extension removable partial denture designs, one using I-bar retention and the other using a semiprecision spring-loaded plunger attachment. Each prosthesis was subjected to vertical and horizontal extension-base loads. Comparisons were made from photographic recordings of isochromatic fringe distributions. The two retention designs produced comparable stresses with splinting of abutments for the plunger attachment. The attachment-retained prosthesis proved less stable with some loadings. Stress patterns followed three trajectories in the maxilla. A basis for stress distribution comparisons to other maxillary removable partial denture attachments is established.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.