Comparison of Liver Transplant–Related Survival Benefit in Patients With Versus Without Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States

Abstract

Patients with T2 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can obtain an exception that allows them to undergo liver transplantation with much lower actual Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores than patients without HCC. We compared patients who received liver transplants, with and without HCC, with regard to transplantation-related survival benefit. We modeled the post-transplantation survival of adult, first-time liver transplant recipients with HCC (n = 9135) or without (n = 25,890) from 2002 through 2013 using Cox proportional hazards regression. We modeled waitlist survival of patients listed for transplantation with HCC (n = 15,605) or without (n = 85,229) using competing risks analysis and combined outcomes of death or liver failure (defined as MELD score ≥30). We used these survival models to calculate monthly transition probabilities and 5-year life expectancies. Survival benefit was calculated as the difference between post-transplantation and waitlist life expectancy. The 5-year survival benefit increased with actual MELD score for patients with and without HCC, ranging from just a few months in patients with low MELD scores (ie, 6-8) to 4 years in patients with the highest MELD scores (ie, 36-40). The survival benefit of patients with HCC was similar to that of patients without HCC who had the same actual MELD score, irrespective of tumor burden or serum level of α-fetoprotein. However, because patients with HCC received liver transplants when they had a lower mean MELD score (13.3 ± 6.2) than patients without HCC (21.8 ± 8.0), a much lower mean 5-year survival benefit was achieved by providing liver transplants to patients with HCC (0.12 years/patient) than patients without HCC (1.47 years/patient). The HCC MELD exception policy has unintentionally resulted in a large reduction in transplantation-related survival benefit.