Abstract
BackgroundMore studies based on gene expression data have been reported in great detail, however, one major challenge for the methodologists is the choice of classification methods. The main purpose of this research was to compare the performance of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and its modification methods for the classification of cancer based on gene expression data.MethodsThe classification performance of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and its modification methods was evaluated by applying these methods to six public cancer gene expression datasets. These methods included linear discriminant analysis (LDA), prediction analysis for microarrays (PAM), shrinkage centroid regularized discriminant analysis (SCRDA), shrinkage linear discriminant analysis (SLDA) and shrinkage diagonal discriminant analysis (SDDA). The procedures were performed by software R 2.80.ResultsPAM picked out fewer feature genes than other methods from most datasets except from Brain dataset. For the two methods of shrinkage discriminant analysis, SLDA selected more genes than SDDA from most datasets except from 2-class lung cancer dataset. When comparing SLDA with SCRDA, SLDA selected more genes than SCRDA from 2-class lung cancer, SRBCT and Brain dataset, the result was opposite for the rest datasets. The average test error of LDA modification methods was lower than LDA method.ConclusionsThe classification performance of LDA modification methods was superior to that of traditional LDA with respect to the average error and there was no significant difference between theses modification methods.
Highlights
More studies based on gene expression data have been reported in great detail, one major challenge for the methodologists is the choice of classification methods
The classification performance of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) modification methods was superior to that of traditional LDA with respect to the average error and there was no significant difference between theses modification methods
Studies on the diagnosis of cancer based on gene expression data have been reported in great detail, one major challenge for the methodologists is the choice of classification methods
Summary
More studies based on gene expression data have been reported in great detail, one major challenge for the methodologists is the choice of classification methods. The main purpose of this research was to compare the performance of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and its modification methods for the classification of cancer based on gene expression data. Studies on the diagnosis of cancer based on gene expression data have been reported in great detail, one major challenge for the methodologists is the choice of classification methods. Proposals to solve this problem have utilized many innovations including the introduction of sophisticated algorithms for support vector machines [1] and the proposal of ensemble methods such as random forests [2]. The main purpose of this research was to describe the performance of LDA and its modification methods for the classification of cancer based on gene expression data
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.