Comparison of left ventricular mass and wall thickness between cardiac computed tomography angiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using machine learning algorithms.

Abstract

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard in the assessment of left ventricle (LV) mass and wall thickness. In recent years, cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has gained widespread usage as an imaging modality. Despite this, limited previous investigations have specifically addressed the potential of CCTA as an alternative modality for quantitative LV assessment. The aim of this study was to compare CCTA derived LV mass and wall thickness with cardiac MRI utilizing machine learning algorithms. Fifty-seven participants who underwent both CCTA and cardiac MRI were identified. LV mass and wall thickness was calculated using LV contours which were automatically placed using in-house developed machine learning models. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated along with Bland-Altman plots to assess the agreement between the LV mass and wall thickness per region on CCTA and cardiac MRI. Inter-observer correlations were tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Average LV mass and wall thickness for CCTA and cardiac MRI were 127 g, 128 g, 7, and 8 mm, respectively. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated mean differences and corresponding 95% limits of agreement of -1.26 (25.06; -27.58) and -0.57 (1.78; -2.92), for LV mass and average LV wall thickness, respectively. Mean differences and corresponding 95% limits of agreement for wall thickness per region were -0.75 (1.34; -2.83), -0.58 (2.14; -3.30), and -0.29 (3.21; -3.79) for the basal, mid, and apical regions, respectively. Inter-observer correlations were excellent. Quantitative assessment of LV mass and wall thickness on CCTA using machine learning algorithms seems feasible and shows good agreement with cardiac MRI.