Comparison of labour and birth outcomes between nulliparous women who used epidural analgesia in labour and those who did not: A prospective cohort study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare labour and birth outcomes between nulliparous women who used versus did not use intrapartum epidural analgesia. DesignProspective cohort study. SettingTwo maternity hospitals in Ireland. PopulationA total of 1221 nulliparous women who gave birth vaginally or by emergency caesarean section. MethodsMultinomial logistic regression was used to analyse categorical outcomes, with results presented as ratios of relative risks (RRR). For dichotomous outcomes we used logistic regression, with results presented as odds ratios (OR). Main outcome measuresMode of birth, IV syntocinon use, pyrexia (≥38°C), antibiotic treatment, first stage labour ≥10h, second stage labour ≥2h, blood loss (≥500mls, ≥1000mls), perineal trauma. Neonatal outcomes included Apgar score ≥7 at 1min and 5min, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and infant feeding method. ResultsWomen using EA were more likely to require a vacuum-assisted birth (RRR 3.35, p<0.01) or forceps-assisted birth (RRR 11.69, p<0.01). Exposure to EA was associated with significantly greater risk of ≥10h first (OR 6.72, p=0.01) and ≥2h second (OR 2.25, p<0.01) stage labour, increased likelihood of receiving IV syntocinon (OR 9.38, p<0.01), antibiotics (OR 2.97, p<0.01) and a greater probability of pyrexia (OR 10.26, p<0.01). Women who used EA were half as likely to be breastfeeding at three months postpartum (OR 0.53, p<0.01). No differences were observed between groups in neonatal outcomes. ConclusionsOur data shows significant associations between EA use and several intrapartum outcomes.