Abstract
A previous study found very significant quality differences in the apparent pattern of a rotary spreader when different methods of collecting pattern samples were used with the same spreader and product. The laboratory methods of pattern evaluation have now been compared with actual crop response to identify which of the laboratory methods is the best indicator of the actual pattern in the field. The study was conducted on turfgrass using a rotary spreader. Turf quality ratings confirmed that rectangular catch pans with an internal grid most accurately predicted the actual rate and distribution pattern on the crop.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
