Comparison of isocratic retention models for hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatographic separation of native and fluorescently labeled oligosaccharides

Abstract

In this work, we have investigated retention of maltooligosaccharides and their fluorescent derivatives in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography using four different stationary phases. The non-derivatized maltooligosaccharides (maltose to maltoheptaose) and their derivatives with 2-aminobenzoic acid, 2‐aminobenzamide, 2-aminopyridine and 8-aminonaphthalene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid were analyzed on silica gel, aminopropyl silica, amide (carbamoyl-bonded silica) and ZIC-HILIC zwitterionic sulfobetain bonded phase. The partitioning of the analytes between the bulk mobile phase and adsorbed water-rich layer, polar and ionic interactions of analytes with stationary phase have been evaluated and compared. The effects of the mobile phase additives (0.1% (v/v) of acetic acid and ammonium acetate in concentration range 5–30 mmolL−1) on retention were described. The suitability of different models for prediction of retention was tested including linear solvent strength model, quadratic model, mixed-mode model, and empirical Neue–Kuss model. The mixed-mode model was extended to the parameter describing the contribution of monomeric glucose unit to the retention of non-derivatized and derivatized maltooligosaccharides, which was used for evaluation of contribution of both, oligosaccharide backbone and end-group to retention.