Abstract

BackgroundThe final endgame strategy of global polio eradication initiative includes switching from trivalent oral poliovirus vaccines (tOPV) to bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV), and introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). This study compares IPV with tOPV week 39 boost in Indian infants.MethodsStarting 28 March 2012, we enrolled 372 Indian infant-mother pairs from Kolkata, India in an open-label, block-randomized, controlled trial comparing a 39 week tOPV to an IPV boost among infants immunized with three doses of tOPV. The primary outcome was mucosal immunity to poliovirus as measured by fecal polio virus shedding after OPV challenge. The secondary outcome was humoral response as defined by >1:8 titers for neutralizing antibodies at week 40. Seroconversion was measured by change in level of antibody titers from week 18 to week 40. The analyses were performed by both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) comparing the occurrences of outcomes between the arms of the study.FindingsBoth the study arms provided equivalent mucosal immunity at 52 weeks with a total shedding prevalence of 28%. Vaccination with IPV resulted in significantly higher seroconversion rates for Polio type 2 (p = 0.03) and Polio type 3 (p < 0.01).ConclusionsThis study indicates that an IPV boost at week 39 is equivalent to tOPV in intestinal immunity, and provides higher seroconversion compared to tOPV. The major limitation of the study was the additional OPV doses receive by infants during pulse polio immunization resulted in additional mucosal boosting, diminishing the impact of IPV or tOPV boost at week 39. However, IPV for OPV boost should prove to be a step forward in the global polio eradication initiative to reduce the problem of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV).

Highlights

  • The global eradication of poliomyelitis is close at hand

  • This study indicates that an inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) boost at week 39 is equivalent to trivalent oral poliovirus vaccines (tOPV) in intestinal immunity, and provides higher seroconversion compared to tOPV

  • The study was approved by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Health Ministry's Screening Committee (HMSC), Government of India; the Institutional Ethical Committee at National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Disease (NICED) and the Institutional Review Boards of International Vaccine Institute (IVI), South Korea; University of Virginia and University of Vermont USA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global eradication of poliomyelitis is close at hand. The year 2015 marked the lowest incidence of paralytic polio since eradication effort were initiated. Afghanistan and Pakistan reported wild poliovirus disease [1]. In 2015, 74 wild poliovirus (WPV) cases were identified; 54 (73%) were detected in Pakistan, and 20 (27%) were detected in Afghanistan. In 2016 three wild poliovirus type 1 (WPV1) cases have been reported from Borno State of Nigeria [2]. In addition to the WPV, about 32 circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) cases were reported from polio-free countries. The final endgame strategy of global polio eradication initiative includes switching from trivalent oral poliovirus vaccines (tOPV) to bivalent oral polio vaccine (bOPV), and introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV). This study compares IPV with tOPV week 39 boost in Indian infants.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call