Comparison of intratracheal pulmonary ventilation with hybrid intratracheal pulmonary ventilation in a rabbit model of acute respiratory distress syndrome by saline lavage.

Abstract

We compared different hybrid mode ITPV (h-ITPV) flow rates, and h-ITPV with intratracheal pulmonary ventilation (ITPV) with respect to CO2 clearance and oxygenation. Surfactant deficiency was induced in six adult rabbits with saline lavage. The study consisted of three phases. Phase 0: Stabilization on conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV). Phase I: Bias flow initiated at same pressure and respiratory rate as Phase 0. Flow rates of 25%, 50%, 75% h-ITPV, and ITPV were initiated. Animals were transitioned from CMV to 25% h-ITPV proceeding sequentially to ITPV or vice versa. Phase II: Animals were returned to CMV. Statistical analysis included the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures ANOVA with Tuckey's test. No difference in PaCO2 was observed among all h-ITPV flow rates or between h-ITPV and ITPV. After bias flow was introduced (transition from Phase 0 to Phase I), PaCO2 decreased by 37%. PaCO2 increased by 119% during Phase II. Oxygenation improved in all animals, particularly in those transitioned to 25% h-ITPV and proceeding to ITPV. No difference in CO2 clearance between ITPV and h-ITPV was observed. Even at low bias flows, excellent CO2 clearance was achieved. Oxygenation was superior when animals were transitioned from CMV to h-ITPV. Hybrid-ITPV offers some advantages over ITPV and may represent a powerful tool in the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).