Abstract

Introduction: Various adjuvants have been added to bupivacaine to shorten the onset of block and prolong the duration of block. Present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of intrathecal clonidine or buprenorphine with bupivacaine in lower abdominal surgeries.
 Methods: 90 ASA I and II patients undergoing lower abdominal surgeries were randomly allocated into three groups(n=30). Group A received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 1ml normal saline, Group B received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 60 mcg buprenorphine(1:5 dilution) and Group C received 3ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 30mcg clonidine(1:5 dilution) respectively (Total volume 4ml). Onset time and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, hemodynamics, VAS score, sedation score and side effect were compared.
 Results: The duration of analgesia was significantly longest in Group C (354.50±38.48min), followed by Group B (277.10±25.47min) and Group A(131.50±20.15min) (p<0.001)
 Conclusion: Clonidine(30mcg) and buprenorphine(60mcg) when used as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally produces significantly longer duration and better quality of postoperative analgesia than bupivacaine alone. On comparing the two drugs, Clonidine appears to be superior in terms of postoperative analgesia.
 Keywords: clonidine, buprenorphine, intrathecal, postoperative analgesia.

Highlights

  • Various adjuvants have been added to bupivacaine to shorten the onset of block and prolong the duration of block

  • The duration of analgesia was significantly longest in Group C (354.50±38.48min), followed by Group B (277.10±25.47min) and Group A(131.50±20.15min) (p

  • This study was designed to compare the efficacy of intrathecal buprenorphine and clonidine with control group for onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, sedation and to evaluate the side effects, if any

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various adjuvants have been added to bupivacaine to shorten the onset of block and prolong the duration of block. Present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of intrathecal clonidine or buprenorphine with bupivacaine in lower abdominal surgeries. Spinal block is still the first choice because of its rapid onset, superior blockade, lower risk of infection, lesser failure rates, and cost-effectiveness but has the drawbacks of shorter duration of block and less postoperative analgesia. Various adjuvants have been used intrathecally to improve the quality and duration of spinal anaesthesia with better postoperative analgesia like epinephrine, neostigmine, midazolam, ketamine, fentanyl, buprenorphine, clonidine and dexmedetomidine.[2] With this background, this study was designed to compare the efficacy of intrathecal buprenorphine and clonidine with control group for onset and duration of sensory and motor block, duration of analgesia, sedation and to evaluate the side effects, if any

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call