Comparison of Intraoperative and Discharge Residual Lesion Severity in Congenital Heart Surgery

Abstract

BackgroundWhile the predischarge technical performance score (DC-TPS) is significantly associated with outcomes after congenital cardiac surgery, the utility of the intraoperative TPS (IO-TPS) remains unknown. MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent congenital cardiac surgery from January 2011 to December 2019. Intraoperative and predischarge echocardiograms were used to assign IO-TPS and DC-TPS, respectively, for each index operation (class 1, no residua; class 2, minor residua; class 3, major residua). Anatomic modules identifying the principal residual lesion were assigned to all class 2/3 patients. Overall and module-specific TPS comparisons were made. Multivariable regression models with IO-TPS and DC-TPS as separate predictors of postoperative outcomes were compared. ResultsOf 6201 patients, overall agreement between IO-TPS and DC-TPS was observed in 4251 patients (68.6%); scores were likelier to be worse at discharge (P < .001). Paired comparative analyses revealed that among patients with at least class 2 atrioventricular and semilunar valve residua, IO-TPS was likelier to worsen than improve (both P < .001). Class 3 patients had a higher risk of in-hospital/early mortality (IO-TPS: odds ratio, 7.5; 95% CI, 2.4-23; DC-TPS: odds ratio, 6.6; 95% CI, 3.0-15), postdischarge/late mortality (IO-TPS: hazard ratio [HR], 3.1, 95% CI, 1.3-7.1; DC-TPS: HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2-4.4), and late unplanned reintervention (IO-TPS: HR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9-4.0; DC-TPS: HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.8-4.2) vs class 1 (all P < .05). IO- and DC-TPS models were equivalent fits for predicting early and late mortality; the latter was a marginally better fit for late reintervention. ConclusionsIO-TPS and DC-TPS are both important adjuncts for quality improvement in congenital cardiac surgery.