Abstract
Objective To compare the coronary incision with the sagittal incision in transaxillary breast augmentation. Methods A total of 60 patients who underwent transaxillary subpectoral breast augmentation with round breast implants were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (30 patients) received coronary incision, while Group B received sagittal incision. The operative time of implant insertion, the distinction of scar and the repair rate of scar were compared between the two groups. Results The mean operative time of implant insertion in group A was (14.55±3.79)s, and that in group B was (27.38±6.79) s, with statistically significant difference (t=9.03, P 0.05) or the repair rate of scar (χ2=0.35, P>0.05) between two groups. Conclusions As for the operative time of implant insertion, the coronary incision is better than the sagittal incision. Key words: Axillary approach; Coronal incision; Sagittal incision; Breast augmentation; Prosthesis implantation; Operation time
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
