Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes When Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot Is in the Neonatal Period Versus in the Post-Neonatal Period

Abstract

Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) is the most common form of cyanotic congenital heart disease (CHD) and optimal timing for total repair of TOF is controversial. We hypothesize that TOF repair in the neonatal period is associated with worse outcomes compared with those who undergo repair later in infancy. We analyzed data using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) from 2003 to 2012. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to compare the in-hospital outcomes between those who underwent total repair of TOF during the neonatal period vs the postneonatal period. There were 6,856 cases of TOF and 7.83% (n = 537) of those underwent repair during the neonatal period. The average mortality in all TOF repair was 2.1% (n = 147). In multiple regression model, compared with repair in postneonatal period, neonatal repair was associated with increased mortality, with adjusted odds ratio of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 4.3, p = 0.023). Regarding complications, the neonatal group was associated with higher risk of acute renal failure (8.9% vs 2.3%, p <0.001), need for cardiac catheterization (18.6% vs 8.3%, p <0.001), and ECMO use (4.4% vs1.6%, p <0.001). There was no difference in the rates of arrhythmia, respiratory failure, pulmonary hypertension, or sudden cardiac arrest. Children who underwent repair in the neonatal period had longer hospital stay compared with the postneonatal group (45.5 days [95% CI: 39.3 to 51.7] vs 12.6 days [95% CI: 11.7 to 13.4], p <0.001). Hospital charges were higher for children who underwent repair in the neonatal period compared with those in the postneonatal period. In conclusion, TOF repair in the neonatal period is associated with higher rates of mortality, more postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and higher hospitalization cost.