Abstract
The statistical estimates of the probability of correct recognition of the images, noisy reference by an additive handicap, for Bayes, correlation, and modified Hopfield network algorithms are compared. It is shown that, in the case of complete a priori probability concerning a handicap, the modified Hopfield network algorithm reaches the quality of the Bayes algorithm. At a deviation a priori probability on a handicap, the quality of the Bayes algorithm is worse than that of the modified Hopfield network algorithm. The correlation algorithm is worse than the modified Hopfield network algorithm, in general.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
