Abstract
To triage low-grade cervical smears (ASCUS/LSIL) by HPV 16/18 genotyping and dual staining with p16/Ki67 and to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these two triage methods for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HGCIN). In this prospective cross-sectional study, we evaluated a total of 89 women with low-grade smears (54 ASCUS, 35 LSIL) recruited from a tertiary care hospital. All patients underwent colposcopy guided cervical biopsy. Histopathology was used as gold standard. All samples were subjected to HPV 16/18 genotyping (excluding 9) using DNA PCR and p16/Ki67 dual staining (excluding 4) using Roche® kit. We then compared the two triage methods to detect high-grade cervical lesions. Overall, in all low-grade smears sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of HPV 16/18 genotyping, was found to be 66.7%, 77.1% and 76.2% respectively (p = 0.03). In low-grade smears sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of dual staining, was found to be 66.7%, 84.8% and 83.5% respectively (p = 0.01). Overall, in all low-grade smears the sensitivity of the two tests was comparable. However, dual staining had a higher specificity and accuracy than HPV 16/18 genotyping. It was concluded that both are effective triage methods but dual staining had a better performance than HPV 16/18 genotyping.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
