Abstract
Purpose: Superiority in corneal diameter, white-to-white (WTW) distance, measurements using objective imaging devices over subjective face-to-face measurements by eye care practitioners (ECP) have been reported previously. The primary aim of this study was to compare manual and automated corneal diameter measurements using two different objective imaging devices. A secondary aim was to compare results obtained by an experienced ECP and novice user.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
