Abstract
Higher assessment is necessary for students' personal development, and the student assessment system is an important part of education. There is a big difference between the standards of the system in Mainland China and Hong Kong, and students and educators in mainland China and Hong Kong have different opinions about the assessment system. Therefore, whether these differences can adapt to students' innovation ability and future development has become a key part of attention. This paper aims to compare the higher education assessment systems of the two regions. Firstly, the assessment problem is discussed. The original assessment system mainly consists of formative and summative, with the participation of educators and even administrative forces. The single thinking paradigm makes it difficult to realize the fairness of the assessment. Based on the above situation, this paper puts forward some suggestions. First, implement a variety of assessment forms, will be in addition to the examination methods, such as scientific research and social practice; Second, include students as the participants and listen to students' opinions on the assessment; Third, reduce the influence of administrative power to ensure fairness in the process of students being assessed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.