Abstract
There are currently three methods that are used for routine measurements of chlorophyll (Chl) a concentrations in extraction solvents. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) provides the most accurate measurement of Chl a, but requires ca. 20 to 25 min processing time for each sample. Spectrophotometric (SPEC) and fluorometric (FLUO) methods are less accurate, but require much less (1 to 5 min) processing time per sample. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of SPEC and FLUO methods for measuring Chl a extracted from estuarine sediment samples. The SPEC method overestimated the Chl a concentration by 16% but the relationship between SPEC and HPLC values was constant. The FLUO method underestimated Chl a concentrations by 3% and the relationship to HPLC determined values was also constant. A paired-comparison of SPEC and FLUO methods showed that although the values were linearly correlated, the FLUO method produced lower Chl a values than the SPEC method. Although SPEC and FLUO methods overestimate and underestimate (respectively) sediment Chl a concentrations, the relationship was linear across a wide range of naturally occurring concentrations. Both SPEC and FLUO methods are suitable for showing relative differences in Chl a concentrations, but should be corrected when absolute concentrations are important.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
