Abstract

BackgroundSince the time of Paul Harrington numerous implants have been introduced for correction of scoliosis, but none are ideal. Newer devices are very expensive, and in our country some patients cannot afford them.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the results of the Harrington rod (HR) device and the newer Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) device in treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).Materials and MethodsA retrospective review assessed patients with AIS admitted for spinal curve correction treated with HR (n = 120) and CD devices (n = 138) between October 1988 to April 2001 at the Shafa Yahyaeian Hospital, Tehran, Iran. We extracted information from the patient’s file and radiographs before, after and two years post-operation.ResultsThe mean age of patients was 16.7 ± 2.5 years. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding gender, age, curve before surgery, and percentage of flexibility. The mean curvature was 70 ± 20.7 in the HR and 64.81 ± 19.4 in the CD group before surgery (P = 0.09); and the mean curvature was 40 ± 16.3 and 26.58 ± 15.37 in HR and CD groups respectively after surgery (P = 0.156). The mean curvature was 47.2 ± 15.9 in HR and 31.2 ± 15.4 in CD groups at two years follow-up (P = 0.156).ConclusionsResults of many studies have shown no significant impairment in long-term quality of life and function in patients treated with Harrington rods. According to previously performed studies and the current study, surgical correction with Harrington rods seem to be comparable with the newer more expensive CD device. Although there is no doubt that the preference is to use newer devices in view of some disadvantages of HR, but this does not preclude using it for patients that cannot afford the newer devices.

Highlights

  • Since the time of Paul Harrington numerous implants have been introduced for correction of scoliosis, but none are ideal

  • There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding curve before and after surgery and percentage of flexibility (P = 0.09, P = 0.157, and P = 0.686, respectively, Table 2)

  • The established segmental fixation devices-including Cotrel-Dubousset, Texas Scottish Rite Hospital (TSRH), and Isola instrumentation became popular in the mid-1980s and, with refinements which allow the use of more pedicle screw fixation points, remain so today

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the time of Paul Harrington numerous implants have been introduced for correction of scoliosis, but none are ideal. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the results of the Harrington rod (HR) device and the newer Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) device in treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). In untreated AIS five problems have been noted: 1) psychosocial effects, 2) back pain, 3) pulmonary dysfunction, 4) curve progression, and 5) mortality [9] These five major considerations are taken into account when deciding to correct the deformity via surgery. Most experts recommend surgical approach for curves greater than 50 degrees, many other factors should be considered.The goals of surgery for spinal deformity include correction or improvement of deformity, keeping sagittal balance, Implication for health policy/practice/research/medical education: Since the time of Paul Harrington numerous implants were introduced for correction of scoliosis, but none are ideal. The aim of this study was to compare the results of the Harrington device and the newer Cotrel-Dubousset device in idiopathic scoliosis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.