Comparison of habitual stepping cadence analysis methods: Relationship with step counts

Abstract

BackgroundDifferent approaches have been implemented to calculate stepping cadence (steps/min) that vary in the time demominator used. Given the differences in how stepping intensity are calculated, it is unclear if they are more so associated with total step counts. Research ObjectiveThis study compared three methods of calculating stepping cadence and determined their relationship with total step counts. Methods132 participants (74♀; 35 ± 20 years; body mass index: 24.9 ± 4.0 kg•m-2) wore an activPAL monitor 24-hr/day for up to 8-d (total: 869-d). The total steps/day, time spent stepping (0.1 s resolution; to calculate bout stepping rate), time spent stepping in 60 s epochs (step accumulation), and awake time (awake cadence) were determined. Each cadence method (in steps/min) were compared via Spearman’s rank correlation. The relationships versus total step count were determined, and the strength of these relationships compared between cadence measures (95% confidence interval of correlation differences). ResultsBout stepping rate (85 ± 14 steps/min) was larger than step accumulation (34 ± 12 steps/min) and awake cadence (10 ± 5 steps/min, both: P < 0.001). Step accumulation was positively strongly related to bout stepping rate (ρ = 0.813; P < 0.001) whereas awake cadence was weakly related to bout stepping rate (ρ = 0.496; P < 0.001). Step accumulation (ρ = 0.634; P < 0.001) and awake cadence (ρ = 0.964; P < 0.001) were more related to step counts than bout stepping rate (ρ = 0.497; P < 0.001; 95% confidence intervals of correlation differences: step accumulation=0.10–0.17, awake cadence: 0.42–0.52). SignificanceWithout a precise measure of time spent stepping, stepping cadence is lower using the step accumulation and awake cadence methods. Step accumulation and awake cadence are more related to total step counts than bout stepping rate. Bout stepping rate outcomes reflect continuous stepping rate, does not rely on a preset epoch, and may have less overlap with step counts, which may have implications for determining the unique contributions of step count versus stepping cadence on health outcomes.