Comparison of glaucoma knowledge and referral practices among family physicians with ophthalmologists’ expectations

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare family physicians’ glaucoma knowledge and clinical skills with ophthalmologists’ expectations. DesignAn electronic cross-sectional survey of family physicians and ophthalmologists. ParticipantsParticipants included members of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society, Canadian Glaucoma Society, and the American Glaucoma Society, as well as family physicians in the Canadian Medical Directory and the Society of Rural Physicians of Canada listserv. MethodsTwo complementary surveys were developed to evaluate family physicians’ glaucoma knowledge and basic examination skills, and ophthalmologists’ expected level of family physician clinical knowledge and skills. χ2 tests identified differences between family physician and ophthalmologist responses. Differences in family physician knowledge based on practice location and frequency of patient visits with a diagnosis of glaucoma were also evaluated. ResultsA total of 142 ophthalmologists and 110 family physicians completed the survey. The majority (82%) of family physicians reported seeing patients with diagnosed glaucoma weekly, monthly, or semiannually. Significantly fewer family physicians than expected (p < 0.001) identified African descent (46%) and corticosteroid use (84%) as glaucoma risk factors. Family physicians were significantly less likely to refer based on risk factors (72%) than expected by ophthalmologists (91%; p < 0.001). Only 28% of family physicians were comfortable performing direct ophthalmoscopy, and 37% were comfortable checking for a relative afferent pupillary defect. A significant percentage of family physicians lacked knowledge of glaucoma medications (30%) and side effects (57%). ConclusionsThis study revealed significant disparities in family physician glaucoma knowledge, clinical examination skills, and referral practices. Educational materials should target these knowledge gaps.