Abstract

Comparisons were made of the fragility ( T g-normalized temperature dependence of segmental relaxation times) derived from mechanical and dielectric measurements to the same quantity determined from the activation energy for enthalpy relaxation as measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). For linear polystyrenes of varying molecular weight, as well as for several other polymers, there was near quantitative agreement between the two measures of fragility. However, for poly(vinylethylene) (PVE) networks, whose normalized temperature dependence by either method increased with increasing crosslink density, the relationship was not quantitative. In contrast to the assessment of fragility, the shape (breadth) of the relaxation function cannot be reliably obtained from DSC measurements. The analysis yields results which depend on thermal history, contradicting the method’s assumption of thermorheological simplicity.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.