Abstract

Introduction: We have developed and utilized the Gravity-guide (G-guide) as a simple manual instrument for intraoperative assessment and adjustment of stem anteversion (AV). Since 2013, we simultaneously measured stem AV using the G-guide and image-free navigation during THA procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the measurement accuracy of the G-guide and navigation system using the postoperative CT results as a reference. Methods: In total, 59 hips in 56 patients who underwent primary THA using both the G-guide and image-free navigation system were included in the study. All patients underwent postoperative CT examination, and the femoral stem AV was assessed using a 3D image analysis system (Zed hip, LEXI, Japan). The AV angle derived from the postoperative CT image analysis was used as the reference value to assess the accuracy of the two intraoperative measurement systems. Results: The discrepancy between the G-guide and the postoperative CT-measured values averaged 5.0° ± 3.9°, while the corresponding value for the navigation system was 5.2° ± 4.1°. Acceptable accuracy with a measurement error of less than 10° was achieved in 86% and 90% of the cases for the G-guide and navigation measurements respectively. Conclusion: Consequently, it was shown that both navigation and G-guide measurements can achieve comparative accuracy and are clinically useful.

Highlights

  • We have developed and utilized the Gravity-guide (G-guide) as a simple manual instrument for intraoperative assessment and adjustment of stem anteversion (AV)

  • Following the line of those previous investigations, the question would be whether the G-guide system can offer accurate measurements in comparison to the navigation system that is used in our current practice

  • The average discrepancy values in the G-guide and navigation measurements were almost the same, and a significant difference was not noted between the two groups (p =0.43)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We have developed and utilized the Gravity-guide (G-guide) as a simple manual instrument for intraoperative assessment and adjustment of stem anteversion (AV). Since 2013, we simultaneously measured stem AV using the G-guide and image-free navigation during THA procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the measurement accuracy of the G-guide and navigation system using the postoperative CT results as a reference. Regarding the optimal implant positioning, Lewinnek defined the “safe zone” of cup alignment as 40° ± 10° of inclination and 15° ± 10° of anteversion (AV) [1]. Due to the cost and effort the navigation system requires, we developed a simple instrument as an alternative, the “Gravity-guide (G-guide)”, for intra-operative assessment and adjustment of stem AV. Following the line of those previous investigations, the question would be whether the G-guide system can offer accurate measurements in comparison to the navigation system that is used in our current practice

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call