Comparison of Functional Outcomes of Intestinal Flaps Vs Tubed Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Circumferential Pharyngoesophageal Defects-an Indian Perspective.

Abstract

Pharyngolaryngoesophageal (PLO) reconstruction is a complex and technically demanding procedure. The reconstructive surgeon's concerns include avoiding fistula and stricture formation, as well as restoring normal speech and swallowing. A retrospective observational study with circumferential pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagal defects with aims and objectives of evaluation and comparison of the long-term functional outcomes like speech and swallowing along with the complications of fistula and stricture in two groups of JFF and FC flaps from the data is collected from electronic medical records of Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, from January 2011 to May 2020. A total of 67 patients (52 JFF and 15 fasciocutaneous flaps) were operated on in last 9 years in our institute. The difference in fistula rates and stricture rates between the two groups was not significant (p= 0.98 and 0.947). The difference in 100% oral diet between the two groups was significant (p= 0.019). The difference in speech rehabilitation between the two groups was significant (p= 0.024). The intestinal tubes and fasciocutaneous tubes have comparable outcomes with regard to fistula and stricture formation. Speech outcomes in the form of the ability to have functional speech and voice quality were significantly better with skin-lined tubes. Swallowing outcomes were much better with intestinal tubes, along with early oral alimentation.