Abstract
This study was conducted to clinically compare the efficacy of freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) and porous hydroxylapatite granules. Nineteen pairs of intraosseous defects were grafted in seven patients. One defect of each pair was implanted with FDBA, the other with granular porous hydroxylapatite. Matching defects were treated similarly in all other aspects. Evaluations were based on both preoperative and postoperative measurements from a fixed reference point, standardized radiographs, surgical osseous measurements, and histology of degranulated tissues. Grafted sites were reentered 6 to 11 months postsurgery. Results showed a mean osseous fill of 2.1 mm for FDBA versus 1.3 mm for granular porous hydroxylapatite (P = .07). A mean clinical attachment gain of 2.2 mm for FDBA versus 1.3 mm for granular porous hydroxylapatite (P less than .05), and a mean decrease in probing depths of 3.0 mm for FDBA versus 1.4 mm for granular porous hydroxylapatite (P less than 0.5) was found. FDBA was clinically indistinguishable from host bone, whereas porous hydroxylapatite appeared to be separated from host bone by soft tissue. The data and clinical findings suggested that FDBA may have some enhanced reparative potential when compared to granular porous hydroxylapatite in the treatment of periodontal defects in humans.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
