Abstract
Several scholars (e.g., Wylie, 1974) have proposed that examination of the results from studies of self-esteem would be facilitated if more information were available about the relationships among various methods of measuring self-esteem. Four methods particularly useful for researchers because of the ease with which they can be administered and scored are: (1) Eagly's version of the Janis-Field Feelings of Inadequacy Scale, (2) Diggory's version of Cutick's Self-description Inventory, (3) Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale, scored as a Likert-type scale, and ( 4 ) Rosenberg's Self-esteem Scale, scored as a Guttman scale. These measures, as presented in Robinson and Shaver (1973). were administered to 194 male and 248 female introductory psychology smdents in order ro selecr individuals for future research. Irem order from Measure 1 was randomized.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
