Abstract

Four enzymatic DNA library preparation kits were compared for sequencing Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. All kits produced high quality sequence data which performed equally well in the downstream analyses for surveillance and outbreak detection. Important differences were noted in the workflow user-friendliness and per sample cost.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call