Comparison of four clinically used external defibrillators for transesophageal defibrillation

Abstract

Defibrillation thresholds (DFT) are lower when using biphasic instead of monophasic shock waveforms. In addition, transesophageal defibrillation can decrease the defibrillation threshold compared to thransthoracic defibrillation due to a different shock vector. We compared the defibrillation thresholds of a monophasic and three biphasic defibrillators in transesophageal defibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced in 12 domestic pigs. Transesophageal defibrillation was performed between two cutaneous patch electrodes and one esophageal electrode. The lowest energy level with successful defibrillation was defined as the DFT. Using four commercially available defibrillators, DFTs were determined for monophasic, truncated exponential biphasic and rectilinear biphasic shock waveforms. DFTs for biphasic transesophageal shocks were significantly lower than for monophasic shocks, reducing DFT to about 50%. There was no significant difference between the three biphasic defibrillators with regard to DFT. The choice of shock waveform can further decrease the already low DFT in transesophageal defibrillation. Similar to transthoracic defibrillation, biphasic shock waveforms yield lower DFTs in transesophageal defibrillation compared to monophasic shocks. The use of different biphasic waveforms does not seem to have a major effect on DFT in transesophageal defibrillation.