Abstract

This work compares two novel strategies that address formation control with collision avoidance for a group of second-order agents. The first control strategy is based on the Backstepping approach (B), while the second is based on the Nested Saturation methodology (NS). Both approaches utilize the Repulsive Vector Fields (RVFs) approach for avoiding collisions. Two numerical simulations are carried out to compare the performance of both approaches. For the first numerical simulation, the simplest case of collision avoidance is considered, that is, the interchange of the position of two agents. On the other hand, for the second numerical simulation, the formation with collision avoidance for a group of nine agents is considered.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.