Abstract
Purpose: We investigated the corneal graft survival rate after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in a veteran population. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing a primary PK or DSEK at a large Veterans Affairs Medical Center between January 2005 and August 2019. Exclusion criteria included patients with a postoperative follow-up less than 5 years and patients undergoing additional ocular procedures during surgery. Patients were classified into 3 groups depending on their glaucoma status before corneal transplant: no pre-existing glaucoma, medically managed glaucoma, or surgically managed glaucoma. Graft survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Results: A total of 30 eyes underwent PK, and 28 eyes underwent DSEK. There was no significant difference in graft survival rates between PK and DSEK at 1 year (83% vs. 79%, P = 0.555), 3 years (53% vs. 64%, P = 0.536), and 5 years (40% vs. 54%, P = 0.399). When combining PK and DSEK groups, Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a highly significant difference in 5-year graft survival between patients without pre-existing glaucoma (58%) and patients with either medically (50%) or surgically managed glaucoma (0%). Conclusions: We find approximate parity in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates after PK and DSEK within the veteran population. However, survival rates for both procedures are lower than those previously reported within other populations. Additional studies to understand these differences in larger cohorts are warranted. Ophthalmologists must understand the increased risk of graft failure in the veteran population to provide appropriate counseling.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.