Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of five different analytical columns for the analysis of seven carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons namely Benz[a]anthracene, Chrysene, Benzo[j]fluoranthene, Benzo[e]Pyrene, Benzo[k]fluoranthene, Benzo[a]Pyrene, Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene and select the best column in terms of separation, peak shape and analysis time and to use the selected column under optimized analytical condition for the detection and estimation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in light cycle oil; one of aromatic rich petroleum stream. The performance of five different analytical columns with different lengths, particle sizes and make were compared for analysis of above PAHs using HPLC with PDA detector and monitoring the HPLC–UV signals at 254 nm wavelength. Chromatographic parameters including retention time (tR), resolution (R), limit of detection, limit of quantification, number of theoretical plates (N), height equivalent to theoretical plate (HETP) and reduced plate height (h) were evaluated and compared on mentioned columns for analysis of PAHs under study. The mobile phase acetonitrile (95%):water (5%) was used at flow rate of 1.5 mL/min and the injection volume in all the case was 20.0 µL. The best results w.r.t time and acceptable resolution were obtained when these PAHs were analyzed using the shorter Agilent Eclipse PAH column having 1.8 µm, 100 mm × 4.6 mm id.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.