Abstract

While even the most common definition of pain is under debate, pain assessment has remained the same for decades. But the paramount importance of precise pain management for successful healthcare has encouraged initiatives to improve the way pain is assessed. Recent approaches have proposed automatic pain evaluation systems using machine learning models trained with data coming from behavioural or physiological sensors. Although yielding promising results, machine learning studies for sensor-based pain recognition remain scattered and not necessarily easy to compare to each other. In particular, the important process of extracting features is usually optimised towards specific datasets. We thus introduce a comparison of feature extraction methods for pain recognition based on physiological sensors in this paper. In addition, the PainMonit Database (PMDB), a new dataset including both objective and subjective annotations for heat-induced pain in 52 subjects, is introduced. In total, five different approaches including techniques based on feature engineering and feature learning with deep learning are evaluated on the BioVid and PMDB datasets. Our studies highlight the following insights: (1) Simple feature engineering approaches can still compete with deep learning approaches in terms of performance. (2) More complex deep learning architectures do not yield better performance compared to simpler ones. (3) Subjective self-reports by subjects can be used instead of objective temperature-based annotations to build a robust pain recognition system.

Highlights

  • Pain can indicate health problems of various kind and serves as natural protective mechanism against harm

  • Since previous work showed the importance of the Electrodermal Activity (EDA) signal outperforming other single sensor modalities for the automated recognition of pain, this paper focuses on the classification of pain based solely on said channel

  • The following section presents the results of the various experiments, first for the BVDB, for the PainMonit Database (PMDB)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pain can indicate health problems of various kind and serves as natural protective mechanism against harm. It is especially important in medicine, as it comprises both symptom and disease [1]. One of the most common definitions of pain dates back to 1979 and is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage” [2] While even this fundamental specification is under debate for revision [3,4,5], pain assessment has remained the same for decades, despite the fact that precise pain management is essential in successful health care. The current gold standard for pain assessment consists of self-report [9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call