Comparison of Experimental, Thermoelastohydrodynamic (TEHD) and Thermal, Non-Deforming Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Results for Thrust Bearings: Part II

Abstract

A thrust bearing is a particular type of rotary bearing permitting rotation between parts but designed to support a predominately axial load. Part I of this study was submitted to ASME 5th Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting. It compared the experimental, TEHD and CFD results for a thrust bearing. Reasonable relative errors between these three results were observed. The outlet oil film thickness at low speeds and the inlet oil film thickness at high speeds as calculated using TEHD were found to be more accurate than their counterparts. Isothermal, non-deforming CFD was found to predict outlet film thickness accurately as thermal deformation has a lower impact in the outlet region. Isothermal and non-deforming CFD was also found to produce a qualitatively accurate film thickness and pressure distribution. Experimental data from a second paper reported by the same authors in Part I, provides temperature measurements in two different pads and showed some variation of temperature from pad to pad. A thermal CFD, different from isothermal CFD in Part I, was performed in this Part II. Different data analysis methods will be included in Part II including a comparison of leading edge, mid-plane and trailing edge temperature at two loads, two speeds. 24 different speed-load combination TEHD cases and 12 CFD cases were run in Part II in addition to the 32 TEHD cases and 8 CFD cases in Part I. Both TEHD and CFD underpredict the slope between temperature and shaft speeds. TEHD also underpredicts the slope between temperature and bearing loads while CFD can get an accurate slope between temperature and bearing loads. An improved inlet temperature model would fix the error between temperature and bearing load in CFD, and also can enable CFD to have the same accuracy as TEHD analysis for the temperature versus shaft speed relation. The inlet film thickness from both TEHD and CFD is underestimated. TEHD is more accurate than CFD in outlet film thickness, or minimum film thickness, which is a critical performance characteristic in fluid film thrust bearings. While CFD is more accurate than TEHD in inlet film thickness and power loss.