Abstract

The accuracy of methods for estimating evapotranspiration at upland in a humid area was investigated at a soybean field. First, hourly evapotranspiration were estimated using the Bowen ratio method, Brown‐Rosenberg method, Batholic method and Monteith method. Second, daily evapotranspiration were estimated using the Ostromeki method, Makkink method, Stephens method, Turc method, Jensen method, van Bavel method, van Bavel‐Businger method and Penman method. Correlativity between estimated and observed values was compared, and superiority of these methods was discussed. When hourly meteorological data were available, the Batholic method was accurate next to the Bowen ratio method. And when daily meteorological data were available, the Stephens method showed high accuracy next to the Penman method, though this method only use average daily temperature and daily solar radiation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.