Comparison of Ethos template-based planning and AI-based dose prediction: General performance, patient optimality, and limitations

Abstract

PurposeEthos proposes a template-based automatic dose planning (Etb) for online adaptive radiotherapy. This study evaluates the general performance of Etb for prostate cancer, as well as the ability to generate patient-optimal plans, by comparing it with another state-of-the-art automatic planning method, i.e., deep learning dose prediction followed by dose mimicking (DP + DM). MaterialsGeneral performances and capability to produce patient-optimal plan were investigated through two studies: Study-S1 generated plans for 45 patients using our initial Ethos clinical goals template (EG_init), and compared them to manually generated plans (MG). For study-S2, 10 patients which showed poor performances at study-S1 were selected.S2 compared the quality of plans generated with four different methods: 1) Ethos initial template (EG_init_selected), 2) Ethos updated template-based on S1 results (EG_upd_selected), 3) DP + DM, and 4) MG plans. ResultsEG_init plans showed satisfactory performance for dose level above 50 Gy: reported mean metrics differences (EG_init minus MG) never exceeded 0.6 %. However, lower dose levels showed loosely optimized metrics, mean differences for V30Gy to rectum and V20Gy to anal canal were of 6.6 % and 13.0 %. EG_init_selected showed amplified differences in V30Gy to rectum and V20Gy to anal canal: 8.5 % and 16.9 %, respectively. These dropped to 5.7 % and 11.5 % for EG_upd_selected plans but strongly increased V60Gy to rectum for 2 patients. DP + DM plans achieved differences of 3.4 % and 4.6 % without compromising any V60Gy. ConclusionGeneral performances of Etb were satisfactory. However, optimizing with template of goals might be limiting for some complex cases. Over our test patients, DP + DM outperformed the Etb approach.