Abstract

ABSTRACTObjective To measure the role of enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid compared with the Bacterial Meningitis Score in children with meningitis.Methods A retrospective cohort based on analysis of medical records of pediatric patients diagnosed as meningitis, seen at a private and tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, between 2011 and 2014. Excluded were patients with critical illness, purpura, ventricular shunt or recent neurosurgery, immunosuppression, concomitant bacterial infection requiring parenteral antibiotic therapy, and those who received antibiotics 72 hours before lumbar puncture.Results The study included 503 patients. Sixty-four patients were excluded and 94 were not submitted to all tests for analysis. Of the remaining 345 patients, 7 were in the Bacterial Meningitis Group and 338 in the Aseptic Meningitis Group. There was no statistical difference between the groups. In the Bacterial Meningitis Score analysis, of the 338 patients with possible aseptic meningitis (negative cultures), 121 of them had one or more points in the Bacterial Meningitis Score, with sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 64.2%, and negative predictive value of 100%. Of the 121 patients with positive Bacterial Meningitis Score, 71% (86 patients) had a positive enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid.Conclusion Enterovirus detection in cerebrospinal fluid was effective to differentiate bacterial from viral meningitis. When the test was analyzed together with the Bacterial Meningitis Score, specificity was higher when compared to Bacterial Meningitis Score alone.

Highlights

  • Meningitis is an inflammatory disease of the meninges, the tissue surrounding the brain and spinal cord, defined by changes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), especially in the number of abnormal leukocytes

  • The majority of patients with aseptic meningitis are unnecessarily hospitalized and receive empirical intravenous antibiotics until the results of blood and CSF cultures are available,(10,11) which may take 48 hours to rule out an infection caused by microorganisms.[12,13,14] An epidemiologic study of meningitis in the United Kingdom concluded that it is urgent to improve the diagnosis of non-bacterial meningitis to reduce the use of antibiotics and admission to hospital.[8]

  • 345 patients met all requirements and were selected for the study - seven were in the Bacterial Meningitis Group, and 338 in the Aseptic Meningitis Group (Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Meningitis is an inflammatory disease of the meninges, the tissue surrounding the brain and spinal cord, defined by changes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), especially in the number of abnormal leukocytes. Blood and/or CSF cultures are positive for routine bacterial pathogens. It is a life threatening condition, with mortality rates near 100% when not treated properly, requiring immediate treatment with empirical intravenous antibiotic therapy and life support management.[1]. The majority of patients with aseptic meningitis are unnecessarily hospitalized and receive empirical intravenous antibiotics until the results of blood and CSF cultures are available,(10,11) which may take 48 hours to rule out an infection caused by microorganisms.[12,13,14] An epidemiologic study of meningitis in the United Kingdom concluded that it is urgent to improve the diagnosis of non-bacterial meningitis to reduce the use of antibiotics and admission to hospital.[8]. The score has high sensitivity for bacterial meningitis, when one or more of the five criteria are present, and in differentiating from aseptic meningitis, but low specificity

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call