Abstract

Energy used for tillage is an input with a high impact on the cost of crop production; it is desirable to till the soil using minimum energy. The objective of this study was to compare the specific energy expenditure, effect on soil bulk density, and forage yield of maize, by three tillage systems: Disk plow/Disk Harrow/planter (DDP), Chisel plow/Disk harrow/planter (CHDP) and No-Tillage (NT). Energy was measured for tillage operations in the summer season of 2013, 2016, and 2017. Bulk density in 2013 and 2016. Yield in 2013 and 2014. The variables of drawbar force (kN), working speed (m s−1), width (m), depth (m), fuel consumption (L ha−1), bulk density (g cm−3), and dry matter yield (Mg ha−1) were measured. Results showed that there were significant differences in the amount of energy used per ha; DDP used an average of 379.75 MJ, CHDP 135.01 MJ, and NT 26.43 MJ. The average energy applied to the soil mass for each system was 400 J kg−1 for DDP, 255.13 J kg−1 for CHDP, and for NT was 237.8 J kg−1. The overall energy efficiency was; 18.23% for DDP, 6.88% for CHDP, and 4.77% for N. The bulk density decreased significantly after three years for NT. There were no significant differences in dry matter yield. In the semiarid condition of Mexico, CHDP and NT are options for saving from 64% to 93% of energy, compared with DDP.

Highlights

  • Soil tillage requires high energy input, normally diesel fuel [1,2,3]

  • The draft was calculated with the force measured to pull the implement and the working width

  • NT system moved volume of soil, compared the Disk plow/Disk Harrow/planter (DDP). These results show demand less volume of soil, compared to the DDP system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Conventional tillage (DDP) implies a working depth from 0.25 m to 0.30 m for disk plowing with an intensive manipulation of a high volume of soil; requiring from five to nine times more energy compared with conservation tillage [5]. This intensive tillage can lead to the degradation of soil structure, increasing the bulk density, and, thereby, affect porosity, hydraulic conductivity, and other soil properties that are important for the availability of water for crops [6].

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call