Abstract
Energy savings for an internally heat-integrated distillation column (HIDiC) and a vapor recompression column for the vacuum separation of acetic acid/acetic anhydride was theoretically analyzed and compared to the simulation of a reference column configuration of the Eastman Chemical Company using ASPEN Plus. In these simulations, the design and operating variables were defined and optimized to minimize total energy used. The effects of design variables such as quantity and location of the heat integration stages, reflux ratio, and rectifying section absolute pressure on energy consumption and product purity revealed that one HIDiC configuration had 62% energy savings over the reference column. The distillation column using vapor recompression was evaluated as a benchmark for comparing the HIDiC configurations and the reference column. The VRC column simulation predicted both increased product purity and an energy savings of 91% over the reference unit.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
