Comparison of Emergency Preparedness Practices between Food Assistance Program Participants and Non-Participants in the United States.

Gina J Fung,Laura K Jefferies,Dennis L Eggett,Michelle A Lloyd Call,Rickelle Richards

doi:10.3390/ijerph182412937

Abstract

Background: Previous research has suggested many households are meeting the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s 3-day emergency food and water storage recommendations. The impact of limited economic household resources on emergency preparedness practices related to food and water is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare emergency preparedness practices in households participating in United States’ food assistance programs with households not participating in these programs. Methods: A convenience sample of adults (n = 572) completed an online Qualtrics survey. Descriptive statistics, chi-square statistics, and independent t-tests were used to measure differences between households participating in food assistance programs vs. non-participating households. Results: Most households participating in food assistance programs felt prepared to provide household members with food and water during an emergency, which did not significantly differ from non-participating households. Households using food assistance programs had less accessible cash but had similar foods on-hand for an emergency compared to non-participating households. However, they more frequently reported having baby formula/food and less frequently reported having vitamin/mineral supplements compared to non-participating households. Conclusions: Food assistance programs may be effective in providing enough food and water to help low-income families be prepared for an emergency.

Highlights

The United States (US) experiences more than 100 natural disasters annually, affecting millions of people and costing an average of $121.3 billion in damages [1,2]
Compared to non-participants, food assistance program participants were younger, had less education, were unemployed, had less time that accessible cash could provide for household needs in an emergency, perceived overall health rating as less favorable, and reported a higher mean number of children in the household
Our results suggested that households participating in food assistance programs feel as prepared in providing household members with food and water during an emergency as those who do not rely on food assistance programs

Summary

Introduction

The United States (US) experiences more than 100 natural disasters annually, affecting millions of people and costing an average of $121.3 billion in damages [1,2]. FEMA recommends that each household have a basic emergency supply kit that includes one gallon of water per person per day for at least three days, and at least a three-day supply of non-perishable food [3]. The impact of limited economic household resources on emergency preparedness practices related to food and water is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to compare emergency preparedness practices in households participating in United States’ food assistance programs with households not participating in these programs. Results: Most households participating in food assistance programs felt prepared to provide household members with food and water during an emergency, which did not significantly differ from non-participating households. Households using food assistance programs had less accessible cash but had similar foods on-hand for an emergency compared to non-participating households. Conclusions: Food assistance programs may be effective in providing enough food and water to help low-income families be prepared for an emergency

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion