Comparison of efficacy and safety of three induction chemotherapy regimens with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP), cisplatin plus fluorouracil (PF) and cisplatin plus capecitabine (PX) for locoregionally advanced previously untreated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pooled analysis of two prospective studies.

Abstract

We compared, in this pooled analysis, the differences in efficacy and safety between three induction chemotherapy regimens including gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP), cisplatin plus fluorouracil (PF) and cisplatin plus capecitabine (PX) in patients recruited into our two prospective studies for previously untreated locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). GP, PF or PX followed by radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy was given to patients with previously untreated locoregionally advanced (stage III to IVA) NPC prospectively recruited into our two prospective studies. The study endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and major acute and late treatment-related toxicities (grade≥3). From 2006 to 2016, 278 patients were enrolled (84, 94 and 100 patients in GP, PF and PX group respectively). After a median follow-up of 80months, the 3-year PFS, OS, LRFS, DMFS and CSS of the whole population were 78.7%, 88.1%, 84.9%, 80.9% and 89.8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in prespecified survival endpoints among GP, PF and PX in both stage III and stage IVA patients. GP had lower incidences of severe (grade≥3) anemia and diarrhea in stage III patients, as well as severe anemia, dehydration, renal impairment and vomiting in stage IVA patients. The incidences of grade≥3 late toxicities were similar among these 3 induction regimens. GP had similar efficacy and potentially fewer treatment-related complications compared with PF and PX as induction chemotherapy for previously untreated locoregionally advanced NPC.