Comparison of efficacy and safety of different minimally invasive therapies for thyroid nodules: A network meta-analysis.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of minimally invasive therapies such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), ethanol ablation (EA), and laser ablation (LA) for thyroid nodules through network meta-analysis (NMA). This study searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies comparing efficacy and safety of different minimally invasive therapies for thyroid nodules. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was implemented to assess quality of included cohort studies, and Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool was utilized to evaluate quality of included RCTs. Eligible studies contained at least one of the following clinical outcome measures: volume reduction rate (VRR), symptom score, cosmetic score, nodule regrowth rate, and complication rate. STATA software was utilized for NMA. Sixteen eligible studies (4 RCTs, 11 retrospective cohort studies, 1 prospective cohort study) involved 4094 patients. NMA results revealed that RFA group had the highest VRR at 1 months and 12 months. There were no significant differences in symptom scores and cosmetic scores among all treatment methods, with the lowest symptom scores and cosmetic scores in RFA group. LA group had a significantly higher nodule regrowth rate than RFA and MWA groups, with the lowest in RFA group. There were no significant differences in complication rate among all treatment methods. RFA had the highest VRR for thyroid nodules, and it excelled in symptom scores, cosmetic scores, and nodule regrowth rates.