Abstract

BackgroundTo compare the edges vascular response, we analyzed the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) parameters after implantation of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) or the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). MethodsTwo hundred-two angina patients (123 men; 61.5±9.2years of age, SES: n=91, PES: n=111) were enrolled. Both edge segments of the stent were analyzed. The change (Δ) of each parameter at follow-up was calculated. ResultsThe edge restenosis rate was higher in the PES group. However, the Δ Vessel, Δ Plaque and Δ Lumen volume at 5mm edge segments were not different between the two groups except the Δ Plaque volume at the distal segment, higher in the PES than the SES group (6.6±15.7 vs. 1.0±13.1mm3, P=.016). In the PES group, lumen area at the both 1mm edge segments decreased because of plaque progression (proximal, 1.9±1.5 to 2.2±2.0mm2, P=.095; distal, 0.6±1.1 to 1.0±1.4mm2, P=.018) with negative remodeling (proximal, 9.9±2.4 to 9.4±2.6mm2, P=.004; distal, 7.6±2.4 to 7.2±2.4mm2, P=.052). Conversely, lumen area at these segments increased due to plaque regression (proximal, 3.2±1.8 to 2.1±1.6mm2, P=.000; distal, 1.5±1.4 to 0.9±1.3mm2, P=.000) even though there was negative remodeling in the SES group (proximal, 10.1±2.4 to 9.6±2.3mm2, P=.019; distal, 7.8±2.3 to 7.5±2.3mm2, P=.074). The Δ Plaque and Δ Lumen area at the both 1mm edge segments were more prominent in the PES group. ConclusionsCompared to SES, PES was associated with luminal reduction accompanied by plaque progression with negative remodeling at edge segments.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call