Abstract

OBJECTIVESThe purpose of this study was to compare the treatment effects of septal myectomy with dual-chamber pacing in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).BACKGROUNDThe optimal treatment for symptomatic patients with drug-refractory HOCM is unknown. Both dual-chamber pacing and surgical myectomy may result in subjective symptom improvement. However, no direct comparisons with objective end points have been reported.METHODSThirty-nine patients with symptomatic HOCM were analyzed in this concurrent cohort study. Twenty patients underwent surgical myectomy, and 19 received dual-chamber pacemakers based on patient preference. These patients had prospective baseline and follow-up evaluations including physician assessment, echocardiography and standardized metabolic treadmill exercise testing.RESULTSBaseline symptom status, left ventricular outflow tract gradients, exercise times and maximal oxygen consumption peak were similar between the two groups. Left ventricular outflow gradient was reduced from 76 ± 57 to 9 ± 17 mm Hg (p = 0.0001) after myectomy, and from 77 ± 61 to 55 ± 39 mm Hg (p = 0.07) after pacing (p = 0.02 for comparison with myectomy). Ninety percent of myectomy patients experienced symptomatic improvement as compared with 47% in the pacing group. Exercise duration increased significantly from 6.6 ± 2.8 to 8.7 ± 3.0 min (p = 0.0003) after myectomy compared with a change from 6.4 ± 2.1 to 7.0 ± 2.2 min (p = NS) in the pacing group. Maximal oxygen consumption increased from 19.4 ± 6.4 to 22.2 ± 6.5 ml/kg/min after myectomy (p = 0.004), whereas the pacing group did not experience any significant change (19.6 ± 6.5 vs. 20.1 ± 6.5 ml/kg/min, p = NS).CONCLUSIONSSurgical myectomy and dual-chamber pacing improve subjective measures of functional status in patients with symptomatic HOCM. In this nonrandomized study, myectomy offered greater reduction in left ventricular outflow tract gradients and larger improvements in objective measures of patient symptoms and functional status when compared with dual-chamber pacing.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.