Comparison of dual and single exposure techniques in dual-energy chest radiography.

Abstract

Conventional chest radiography is the most effective tool for lung cancer detection and diagnosis; nevertheless, a high percentage of lung cancer tumors are missed because of the overlap of lung nodule image contrast with bone image contrast in a chest radiograph. Two different energy subtraction strategies, dual exposure and single exposure techniques, were studied for decomposing a radiograph into bone-free and soft tissue-free images to address this problem. For comparing the efficiency of these two techniques in lung nodule detection, the performances of the techniques were evaluated on the basis of residual tissue contrast, energy separation, and signal-to-noise ratio. The evaluation was based on both computer simulation and experimental verification. The dual exposure technique was found to be better than the single exposure technique because of its higher signal-to-noise ratio and greater residual tissue contrast. However, x-ray tube loading and patient motion are problems.